Chelsea: The Ideal Defence

When the appointment of Rafael Benitez was announced by Chelsea, many expected the Spaniard to tighten up the Chelsea defence, as he had done when he arrived at Liverpool.

In those years, Benitez had quite a consistent back line of defenders, with Jamie Carragher, Sami Hyypia, Steve Finnan and Djimi Traore playing most games in the early years, and with Daniel Agger, Jamie Carragher, Martin Skrtel, Alvaro Arbeloa and Fabio Aurelio being regulars towards the end of Benitez’s tenure.

But at Chelsea, it appears Benitez doesn’t know exactly who his best four defenders are.

At right back, Chelsea only really have two options, those options being natural right back Cesar Azpilicueta and versatile Branislav Ivanovic who prefers playing at the heart of the defence. Roberto Di Matteo seemed to prefer Ivanovic at right back, not much of a surprise considering how many though of Ivanovic as the Premier League’s best in that position towards the end of the 2009/10 season.

But since Benitez’s arrival, Cesar Azpilicueta has taken that place more regularly, putting in solid displays against Manchester City, Fulham, Leeds and in the 8-0 trouncing of Aston Villa. However, in recent games, the Spaniard has made a few foolish and ultimately costly errors.

Many people, including myself feel he was at fault for both Southampton goals in that 2-2 draw back in January at Stamford Bridge, and he has looked defensively frail on too many occasions for him to be considered reliable in my opinion. So, due to his power and ability to assist the centre halves, whoever they may be on the day, I feel Branislav Ivanovic is Chelsea’s best option at right back, although he would probably rather be at centre back himself.

Speaking of the centre back position, that area has also been a problem for Chelsea this season too, arguably their biggest problem aside from a feeling of discontent among many of the club’s fans towards manager Rafael Benitez.

Gary Cahill, who had an excellent first half a season in the blue shirt of Chelsea last year, hasn’t been as consistent this campaign. His last ditch tackles have been as impressive as ever, but the point is that he lets strikers in good positions far too often. Many have touted Cahill as a future Chelsea club captain, but I feel he needs to regain his focus if he wants to be at a level where he is one of Chelsea’s first names on the team sheet.

David Luiz, who many have written off as being too rash and too eager to impress, has mellowed this season apparently. Although he still does love to run forward with the ball, he is much less wasteful and indecisive when on the ball. Those defensive positioning problems still do exist for the Brazilian, but they are slowly but surely coming out of his game.

John Terry, the Chelsea club captain of the past nine years, is also being written off by many. More and more injuries, less and less clean sheets and more lapses in concentration mean Terry is no longer a guaranteed starter for Chelsea, despite still being captain and a hero to many of the club’s fans.

Some have claimed Terry is off the pace and he certainly does not have the energy levels he once had. In saying this, as a Chelsea fan, I do feel a lot less concerned when opposition sides go forward when John Terry is at the heart of the defence.

When deciding on which centre backs to play in the ideal Chelsea starting eleven, I think it is important to consider which combinations work. In my opinion, Chelsea’s best collective defensive performance of the entire 2011/12 season was at home to the mighty FC Barcelona in the first leg of the Champions League semi-final, which Chelsea famously went on to win, both legs, the tie and eventually the competition.

Despite countless offensive onslaughts by Barcelona’s star studded attacking players, the central defensive partnership of Gary Cahill and John Terry held strong and saw them through to a 1-0 win which went a long way to securing European success for the Blues.

Based on this immense performance, Cahill and Terry have the potential to be a superb defensive partnership on their day and so I think they should be given a run in the side together.

To make up the defensive line of course I would have Ashley Cole, who is still the best left back in the world in my opinion, and a Chelsea legend.

His contract extension means he is ideal for Chelsea and can help to improve Ryan Bertrand, and any other young left backs at the club.

 

Written by Joshua Sodergren

Follow him on Twitter @chelsealad1365

Please like O-Posts on Facebook

You can follow O-Posts on Twitter @OPosts

Mario Mandzukic: The Croat star basking in Bayern’s glory

In what has been a barnstorming start to the Bundesliga season for FC Bayern, some players’ performances have been outstanding. Croat Mario Mandžukić has lead the line superbly and set the league alight with remarkable form in front of goal….

Euro 2012 was a tournament which somewhat disappointed in terms of individual performances. Household names such as Zlatan Ibrahimovic and Andrea Pirlo were the ones who took the plaudits, but Croatia seemed to have produced a player whose form managed to turn heads of many.

Mario Mandžukić burst onto the global scene with a spectacular brace against the Republic of Ireland and the striker was quickly linked with a move away from his club VFL Wölfsburg.

Everton were reportedly keen in partnering Mandžukić with international team mate Nikica Jelavić but it was instead German powerhouses and Champions League runners-up Bayern Munich who gave Mandžukić the opportunity to play Champions League football for a top club, something the Toffees couldn’t offer.

With Mario Gomez the only striker at Bayern in the summer, they required more firepower. Mandžukić was signed to compete with his namesake and, crucially, score goals. He has not disappointed.

When he was signed it was expected that he would start his career with the club playing second fiddle to Gomez but a pre-season ankle injury to the German meant Mandžukić was immediately asked to be the team’s main striker. He seized his chance, and 2 months into Gomez’s return Jupp Heynckes has been left by Mandžukić with no choice but to pick his summer signing over Germany’s first choice Centre forward.

The Croat has effortlessly slotted into the team.Hisaerial prowesspaired with his clinical finishing ability have made him an instant hit with FCB’s fans, players and coaches alike.

An impressive 14 goals in 18 games stands him in good stead as the top scorer in the Bundesliga, dominated by the Bavarian giants. He’s been man of the match in his last two games, showing that he definitely didn’t lose any sharpness over the winter break.

Mandžukić possesses many traits as a striker but selfishness definitely isn’t one  of them – he has created 78 chances for his team mates and provided two assists. Add that to his remarkable goal tally and you’ve got one hell of a striker.

FCB lead second place Borussia Dortmund by a chasm of 12 points – and in doing so consigning those consecutive title wins for Die Borussen to history. There is no denying that Mandžukić could not have done so well without the rest of Heynckes team putting in a shift.

The midfield, marshaled excellently by Bastian Schweinsteiger, has been majestic game after game, with Thomas Müller playing a large part in Mandžukić’s form in front of goal. Hauls of 11 goals and 8 assists, the most in the league, have proved to critics that the midfield man is more than capable of showing the form of World Cup 2010.

Mandžukić is only just starting to receive plaudits across the football world but at all his clubs he has provided goals. Having to step in for Gomez was a familiar situation to the Croat, upon whose shoulders was placed the burden of taking over the goal scoring mantle of Edin Džeko as the Bosnian left Wölfsburg in 2011.

At the age of 26, he may now be at the peak of his powers, and the chance to play at a club the size of Bayern is one that is a long time coming and well deserved.

Whether Mandžukić and Gomez will be used together in attack by Heynckes is yet to be seen, especially with attacking midfield trio of Müller, Toni Kroos and Franck Ribery firing on all cylinders (not to mention Robben and Shaqiri). As an indication of how well Mandžukić has played, Mario Gomez was placed instantly into Germany’s highly anticipated friendly with France yet has been resigned to only one Bundesliga start all season.

There is no doubt that the 2012 Croatian Player of the Year can go on to establish himself as one of the best in Europe, and what better way to continue his scintillating form than Bayern’s upcoming Champions League encounter with Arsenal? The Gunners will be wary, as every defence in Germany is.

 

Written by Richard Burn

Follow Richard on Twitter @richard_burn15

Please like O-Posts on Facebook

You can follow O-Posts on Twitter @OPosts

Barcelona: Valdes’ decision causes mixed reaction

Last month the Barcelona goalkeeper Victor Valdes announced that he would not be renewing his contract with the club that ends in June 2014. He has been the first choice goalkeeper since 2003/4 and has won a staggering 19 titles with his beloved Barcelona.

There has been a fairly mixed reaction to the news that the Catalan club now need to find a replacement goalkeeper. Some feel that it is greed and that he has possibly already negotiated a better deal elsewhere. Others feel that he owes the club everything and should be more loyal, whilst some feel that he has dedicated a significant period of his career to the club and should be celebrated rather than berated.

Ever since becoming number one at Barcelona there are very few players who have divided opinion as much as Valdes. Many see him as being the weak point of the side; someone who makes too many errors and a player some see as not good enough to warrant the role he has enjoyed at the club for the last 10 seasons.

Others, this writer included, feel that he is a highly underrated keeper who has, at times kept Barcelona in games when they didn’t deserve to be so (away at the Mestalla last weekend against Valencia for example).

One thing in particular stands out about Valdes’ keeping ability which is his ability at one on one shot stopping. There are few goalkeepers in the world who are quite as accomplished when dealing with an on coming striker. Perhaps the constant training with the likes of Iniesta, Messi, Ronaldinho and Villa have given him an insight into the striker’s mind. Somehow he always manages to get a touch on everything and protect the goal.

Most people forget that being a goalkeeper in a side such as Barca’s is actually quite a tough job. For long periods of the game you can have nothing to do as your side is controlling the possession but at any time you could be called into action and focus needs to be applied. It is actually when your star performers are not quite at their best when you find out how good your goalkeeper is, and Valdes has proved that time and again during his career.

The list of attributes needed to replace Valdes would make interesting reading. Firstly they will have to be a good commanding keeper capable of organising a defence.

Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, they will have to be good in possession as much of Barca’s distribution from the defence is made along the ground. There have been several names touted around at the moment and that will be commented upon at length over the coming months.

Whatever the feeling is about Valdes’ decision it is one that has been made and the future is now the important thing. It is almost inconceivable to think it will affect the player’s dedication to the cause and could actually inspire him towards one last push.

He has been a great servant for the club and has at least allowed them plenty of time to find his replacement.

 

Written by Andy Hunter

Follow Andy on Twitter @hunter67980

Please like O-Posts on Facebook

You can follow O-Posts on Twitter @OPosts

Booing in Football: Help or hindrance to a club’s on-going issues?

Booing is an issue which divides supporters of the same club let alone within the same country, and one that came into focus over the weekend. Some fans say ‘You make your choice, you pay your money, you can do what you like’, but when booing works against your side and consistently costs them points, why do it?

Aston Villa’s winter of discontent saw them humiliated out of both cups and walloped at home time and time again. (Re ‘Winter of Discontent’: Excuse the cliché but if there’s ever a week for a Richard III reference, it’s definitely this one. Hint: there’s another nod to Shakespeare coming up).

Since November, to a backdrop of boos, Lambert’s youngsters have lost four of five home games – their only ‘positive’ result a 0-0 draw with Stoke. Inversely, Villa have lost just once on the road following trips to QPR, Liverpool, Swansea, West Brom and Everton. The dejected Villa Park moans it seems are negatively affecting results.

So I put it to you simply, to boo or not to boo, that is the question.
Of course there’s a chicken and egg argument here. Do fans boo because results are poor or are results poor because fans boo? I’d guess the former on the basis that fans presumably do not launch unprovoked attacks on their own team, but the issue boils down reaction: how do real fans cope with disappointment/ failure?

Consider Villa’s weekend opponents Everton. Since December 15, Blues fans have ripped their Red counterparts non-stop after their 3-1 home defeat to the Villains, yet an hour into Saturday’s game, the Toffees were in the exact same position in a match that could have sent them fourth.

The fans remained onside, they didn’t boo once. Look and behold, Everton drew level and gave themselves a chance of victory.

 

The ‘confused boo’

The key aspect is entitlement. If you demand your side wins every week, you’re going to end up booing because that is definitely not going to happen. Take Chelsea fans for instance who have become so deplorably immersed in the gimme, gimme, gimme culture of money-gifted success, they’ve given rise to a new form of disenchantment in the stands, the ‘confused boo’.

We’ve seen this recently with fans’ unsustainable anger at Roman Abramovic after heartlessly sacking of Double-winning fan favourite Roberto Di Matteo has been displaced into a more conventional rage at temporary manager Rafa Benitez. Granted Rafa made some ‘deeply hurtful’ (spot on) comments about flags, but what sort of moral high ground permits abuse of name-callers but not club legend-axers?

Home fans have booed Benitez from minute one of his two-month Stamford Bridge reign. Unsurprisingly, the Blues have won just 38% of their home fixtures (3/8) compared to 54% (7/13) away. No top six side has beaten Norwich, Everton or Stoke away this season, Chelsea have beaten all three.

On the road, altered conditions can suit a struggling side. Pressure decreases, scrutiny is reduced, as the noise from visiting supporters is almost exclusively positive. With the burden of expectation lifted, the impact of failure lessens freeing up teams to play better.

There’s surely a lesson there for home fans. The point of support must be to optimise your team’s chance of victory. Booing merely turns an opportunity for huge gain into severe disadvantage, at which point, fans only have themselves to blame in the event of a defeat.

 

Written by Chris Smith

Follow Chris on Twitter @cdsmith789 and visit his blog www.therussianlinesman.com

Please like O-Posts on Facebook

You can follow O-Posts on Twitter @OPosts